TOY REVIEW ARCHIVE    LIVING WITH LATE FEES    FEATURES    LINKS    BIO    MISSION    EMAIL


 Identity


Buy at Amazon!

The plot in a nutshell
Eleven strangers all end up trapped by a storm at a cheap motel in the Nevada desert.  There seems to be no relation between them - until they begin to die, one by one.  Who's the killer?  And what does it all have to do with another mass murderer, currently under psychiatric evaluation and soon to be put to death?

The film is part horror, part mystery, with a couple interesting twists thrown in for good measure.  Things are not always what they seem...

Relatively Spoiler Free Thoughts
At first, the premise for this film seems fairly basic - a group of people, brought together by some force outside their control, are slowly killed off
.  Ten Little Indians is the obviously similar movie, but others such as House on Haunted Hill come to mind.  But while this premise might seem played, the director (James Mangold) and writer (Michael Cooney) use this familiarity to lull you into believing you're watching one film when you're really watching another.

The ads and reviews when this film first came out have already given away the fact that there's a twist, so that's not spoiling much.  I won't get into the details til my spoiler section, but suffice to say that it's well written, clever and fairly unique.  I've heard lots of people complain that they were capable of figuring it out.  Guess what - if a film is well written, it SHOULD be possible to figure out what's up.  If it's not, then you're usually only getting part of the story or the writer is cheating by actually creating implausible plot points.  Here everything makes sense, in the context of the story, and once all is revealed none of it is difficult to understand. By the way, if you think a movie isn't clever, witty or smart because you were able to figure it out, what does that say about you?

James Mangold hasn't done much directing yet, but what he has done has all been fairly smart.  Before Identity, there was Copland and Girl Interrupted, and somehow Kate and Leopold snuck in there.  Nobody is perfect.  He's obviously a director to watch though, and he did a superb job developing tension and suspense.

Michael Cooney has written even less, and this is his first real break out.  Prior to this we have the two Jack Frost killer snowman movies.  I've never been fortunate enough to catch one of these films, but I'm betting they don't have quite the wit and style as Identity.  Perhaps we'll see other great things from him, now that he's proven his chops.

The acting is fantastic, but that's not surprising considering the solid talent.  John Cusack, one of the best male leads these days, is Ed, ex-cop and current limo driver.  His current customer is Caroline Suzanne, a washed up actress played perfectly by Rebecca De Mornay.  There's Ray Liotta as a cop, certainly a role he knows well. Jake Busey plays a psychotic prisoner being transported by Liotta, and that's certainly no real stretch for him either. Amanda Peet plays the ex-hooker, and the always great John C. McGinley as George York, neurotic step-father.  The entire cast plays their stereotypical characters perfectly, and the fact that they are stereotypes is crucial to the success of the film.

This is a clever film, and a short one on top of it at just under an hour and a half.  That makes the overall story telling even more impressive, since they manage to develop and interesting plot, fill it out well, and yet not waste time on excessive explanations or verbose dialog.  If you're looking for an interesting film, with a few good jumps thrown in, you could do a lot worse than Identity.

Rating - Buy It
This is one that you *might* want to consider purchasing after you've watched it.  It will be worth repeat viewings, and it's one of those films you'll enjoy sharing with others on stormy, dark nights.  The DVD carries both the theatrical version and an extended version, but I haven't watched the extended version as of yet.  I hear it's not a Peter Jacksonesque extended version though with only a few seconds of additional footage, and you don't lose much with the normal theatrical take.

Spoiler Laden Thoughts
Yes, it was clever, but there are a few things to question...

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

If you've wandered down into this section, then you're prepared to talk about what's really happening.  Yep, it's all in the mind of a killer, one with split personalities.  These personalities aren't in any 'real' place, but inside his mind, fighting for their lives.  One of them is killing off the others, and if Rivers (the only real person) has any chance of survival, the worst of his personalities, the one that did all that killing years before, has to be destroyed by the others.

But which one is the baddest of the bad?  Let's face it, Jake Busey is no sweetheart, and neither is Ray Liotta.  The fact that Liotta was another convict became apparent when we see his bloody shirt, but it was still interesting to watch as he was found out by the others.  The eventual realization that it's little Timmy might be seen by the careful observer - he is the last one to be with his mother, he did cause his father to die, there was only one key when they went to the burned out car, and he was in general a little on the freak-fest side -  but they still did a pretty good job of forcing you to focus on Liotta.  Some people have said they would have preferred if Peet was actually the nut case, but that would have been a real cheat, since we'd never seen any indication at all that she was capable of such things.

The fact that it was all in one man's mind was also telegraphed early, or at least that something wasn't quite right.  When Busey ran but ended up back at the motel, that was a pretty good clue that this reality wasn't quite what it seemed to be.  Still, they kept this twist a secret just long enough, and I was happy with how and when it was revealed.

There are a couple open questions though.  Who were the dead cop and the dead motel owner?  Where they part of his multiple personalities, or were they simply props in his mind?  Since both are already dead in this little play, I felt they were nothing more than props, similar to the motel itself, and simply helped move the story along in Rivers' mind.

Another question, or more accurately an odd feeling scene, is when Cusack goes looking for the first person to die, the actress he had been driving.  In the film he is by himself, and finds the shower curtain rod clips, leading him to the laundry.  But it seems disjointed, since even seeing and recognizing the clip for what it was is a stretch.  On top of that, when Larry and Rhodes show up at the laundry after him, they don't seem in the least surprised that he's there, or wonder what's going on.  There is a deleted scene on the DVD that shows the extended version of this scene, in which the three of them together are actually all looking for the actress, and while it made the film a couple minutes longer (and had an unnecessary scene of humor that may have broken the tension), at least it made more sense than the final cut.

I was also a little unclear as to why the doctor felt that some other personality other than the worst of the worst would come out on top.  Wouldn't it seem more likely that the most violent, most disturbed, and most willing to destroy of the personalities would be the one most likely to destroy the others?

Finally, there's an interesting tie between the number of killings in Rivers' mind and the number of real murders he's committed.  He killed 6 people at the apartment complex - he kills six personalities at the motel.  The seventh, eighth and nineth personalities kill each other.  And then he kills the final one, Paris, at the same time he kills his doctor in 'real' life, matching the killings again.  If Rivers has no more personalities, will he kill again?

This is certainly the kind of film you can watch more than once and get more out of with each viewing.

This page copyright 2003, Michael Crawford. All rights reserved. Hosted by 1 Hour Hosting.com